Skip to content
April 23:The Zeebrugge Raid108yr ago

F-16V Viper vs Gripen E

The global workhorse vs the Nordic efficiency champion

General Dynamics F-16V (Block 70/72) Viper
馃嚭馃嚫

F-16V Viper

United States 路 In service 2015

The F-16V Viper is the latest production variant of the world's most successful fourth-generation fighter. Fitted with an AESA radar, modern cockpit, and enhanced electronic warfare, it offers proven multi-role performance at a fraction of fifth-generation costs.

Saab JAS 39E Gripen
馃嚫馃嚜

Gripen E

Sweden 路 In service 2024

The Gripen E is Sweden's latest lightweight multi-role fighter, designed for affordability, dispersed operations, and rapid turnaround from highway strips. Its advanced AESA radar and data-link capabilities punch well above its weight class.

The Matchup

Both are single-engine, AESA-equipped fighters competing for the same export market. The F-16V brings decades of combat pedigree and a massive logistics ecosystem. The Gripen E counters with lower operating costs and dispersed-operations capability.

Performance Radar

FirepowerProtectionMobilityTechnologyVersatilityCost Efficiency
F-16V Viper
Gripen E

Rating Breakdown

F-16V Viper: 75FirepowerGripen E: 72
F-16V Viper: 55ProtectionGripen E: 62
F-16V Viper: 85MobilityGripen E: 82
F-16V Viper: 75TechnologyGripen E: 82
F-16V Viper: 85VersatilityGripen E: 80
F-16V Viper: 88Cost EfficiencyGripen E: 90

Specifications

SpecificationF-16V ViperGripen E
Max SpeedMach 2.0 (1,320 mph)Mach 2.0 (1,320 mph)
Combat Radius340 mi (546 km) on internal fuel810 mi (1,300 km)
Service Ceiling50,000+ ft52,000 ft
Max G+9.0+9.0
Thrust/Weight1.0950.97 (clean)
Weapons Stations9 hardpoints, 17,000 lb total10 hardpoints, 12,100 lb total
RadarAN/APG-83 SABR AESAPS-05/A Mk 7 Raven ES-05 AESA
Unit Cost$63M (Block 70, 2023)$85M (2023)
Engine1x GE F110-GE-132 or P&W F100-PW-2291x GE F414G
Crew11
Length49.5 ft49.2 ft
Wingspan32.8 ft28.9 ft

Strengths & Weaknesses

F-16V Viper

Strengths

  • + Enormous global fleet with decades of logistics infrastructure
  • + AESA radar provides near-fifth-gen situational awareness
  • + Excellent cost-per-flight-hour for training and operations
  • + Over 4,600 produced, massive parts and weapons ecosystem

Weaknesses

  • - Single engine with no stealth features
  • - Airframe approaching design limits for future growth
  • - Shorter combat radius than twin-engine fighters
  • - Older platform architecture limits deep upgrades

Gripen E

Strengths

  • + Lowest operating cost per flight hour of any Western fighter
  • + Designed for highway strip and dispersed operations
  • + Quick turnaround: refuel and rearm in 10 minutes
  • + Advanced data-link and network-centric warfare capabilities

Weaknesses

  • - Single engine limits redundancy and raw thrust
  • - Smaller weapons payload than twin-engine competitors
  • - Limited operator base compared to F-35 or Typhoon
  • - Lightweight design limits growth potential

Verdict

The F-16V offers superior combat pedigree and a vast weapons ecosystem, while the Gripen E offers lower lifecycle costs and unique operational flexibility. The choice depends on operator priorities: proven capability or economic efficiency.