Skip to content
April 23:The Zeebrugge Raid108yr ago

Arleigh Burke III vs Sejong the Great

SPY-6 next-gen radar vs maximum VLS firepower

Arleigh Burke-class (Flight III) DDG
馃嚭馃嚫

Arleigh Burke III

United States 路 In service 2024

The Arleigh Burke Flight III is the latest evolution of the US Navy's backbone surface combatant. It features the AN/SPY-6(V)1 AMDR radar, a massive upgrade over earlier Aegis variants, with significantly improved sensitivity for ballistic missile defense and air warfare.

Read full article
Sejong the Great-class (KDX-III) DDG
馃嚢馃嚪

Sejong the Great

South Korea 路 In service 2008

The Sejong the Great-class is South Korea's Aegis-equipped destroyer and one of the most heavily armed surface combatants in the world. With 128 VLS cells combining Mk 41 and Korean K-VLS, it carries a formidable mix of weapons for all warfare domains.

The Matchup

Both are Aegis-equipped destroyers, but the Sejong the Great packs 128 VLS cells, more than any other surface combatant in the Pacific. Does raw missile count outweigh the Burke III's newer radar technology?

Performance Radar

FirepowerProtectionMobilityTechnologyVersatilityCost Efficiency
Arleigh Burke III
Sejong the Great

Rating Breakdown

Arleigh Burke III: 92FirepowerSejong the Great: 95
Arleigh Burke III: 75ProtectionSejong the Great: 72
Arleigh Burke III: 80MobilitySejong the Great: 75
Arleigh Burke III: 95TechnologySejong the Great: 82
Arleigh Burke III: 95VersatilitySejong the Great: 88
Arleigh Burke III: 55Cost EfficiencySejong the Great: 70

Specifications

SpecificationArleigh Burke IIISejong the Great
Displacement9,800 tons (full load)11,000 tons (full load)
VLS Cells96 Mk 41 VLS cells128 total (80 Mk 41 + 48 K-VLS)
Main Gun1x 5-inch/62 Mk 45 Mod 41x 5-inch/62 Mk 45 Mod 4
Speed30+ knots30 knots
Crew329300
Length509 ft (155 m)545 ft (166 m)
Beam66 ft (20 m)69 ft (21 m)
RadarAN/SPY-6(V)1 AMDR AESAAN/SPY-1D(V) (Aegis)
Unit Cost$2.2B (FY2023)$1.1B (estimated)

Strengths & Weaknesses

Arleigh Burke III

Strengths

  • + AN/SPY-6 radar offers 30x sensitivity improvement over SPY-1
  • + Integrated air and missile defense capability
  • + 96 VLS cells for Tomahawk, SM-2/3/6, ESSM, ASROC
  • + Decades of proven Aegis Combat System maturity

Weaknesses

  • - Very high unit cost approaching $2.2 billion
  • - Hull design dating to 1980s limits growth potential
  • - No integrated electric propulsion for future energy weapons
  • - Large crew requirement compared to modern designs

Sejong the Great

Strengths

  • + 128 VLS cells, among the most of any surface combatant
  • + Dual VLS systems (Mk 41 + K-VLS) for maximum flexibility
  • + Full Aegis Combat System with BMD capability
  • + Indigenous Hyunmoo cruise missiles in K-VLS cells

Weaknesses

  • - Older SPY-1D radar vs newer SPY-6 on Burke III
  • - Large crew requirement for its class
  • - Only 3 ships in class, limited fleet presence
  • - Korean-specific weapons limit NATO interoperability

Verdict

The Burke III's SPY-6 radar represents a generational leap in detection capability, but the Sejong's 128 VLS cells and lower cost make it an impressive value proposition. Both are outstanding combatants for Pacific operations.

Related Articles