Skip to content
April 23:The Zeebrugge Raid108yr ago

Zumwalt vs Arleigh Burke III

Stealth destroyer vs the fleet's proven workhorse

Bath Iron Works DDG-1000 Zumwalt-class
馃嚭馃嚫

DDG-1000 Zumwalt

United States 路 In service 2016

The Zumwalt-class is the US Navy's stealthy land-attack destroyer, featuring a tumblehome hull, integrated power system, and advanced automation that reduces crew size to 140. Only three were built before the program was scaled back.

Arleigh Burke-class (Flight III) DDG
馃嚭馃嚫

Arleigh Burke III

United States 路 In service 2024

The Arleigh Burke Flight III is the latest evolution of the US Navy's backbone surface combatant. It features the AN/SPY-6(V)1 AMDR radar, a massive upgrade over earlier Aegis variants, with significantly improved sensitivity for ballistic missile defense and air warfare.

Read full article

The Matchup

The Zumwalt was supposed to be the future of the surface fleet. Instead, the Burke III carries on. How does the revolutionary-but-troubled Zumwalt compare to the evolutionary-but-reliable Burke III?

Performance Radar

FirepowerProtectionMobilityTechnologyVersatilityCost Efficiency
DDG-1000 Zumwalt
Arleigh Burke III

Rating Breakdown

DDG-1000 Zumwalt: 85FirepowerArleigh Burke III: 92
DDG-1000 Zumwalt: 70ProtectionArleigh Burke III: 75
DDG-1000 Zumwalt: 78MobilityArleigh Burke III: 80
DDG-1000 Zumwalt: 92TechnologyArleigh Burke III: 95
DDG-1000 Zumwalt: 72VersatilityArleigh Burke III: 95
DDG-1000 Zumwalt: 20Cost EfficiencyArleigh Burke III: 55

Specifications

SpecificationDDG-1000 ZumwaltArleigh Burke III
Displacement15,995 tons (full load)9,800 tons (full load)
VLS Cells80 Mk 57 peripheral VLS cells96 Mk 41 VLS cells
Main Gun2x 155mm AGS (being replaced by hypersonic CPS)1x 5-inch/62 Mk 45 Mod 4
Speed30+ knots30+ knots
Crew140329
Length610 ft (186 m)509 ft (155 m)
Beam81 ft (24.6 m)66 ft (20 m)
RadarAN/SPY-3 X-band + AN/SPY-4 S-band (VSR)AN/SPY-6(V)1 AMDR AESA
Unit Cost$4.4B (actual, including R&D amortization)$2.2B (FY2023)

Strengths & Weaknesses

DDG-1000 Zumwalt

Strengths

  • + Radar cross section of a fishing boat despite 15,000-ton displacement
  • + Integrated electric propulsion supports future energy weapons
  • + Automated systems reduce crew to 140 (vs 329 on Burke)
  • + Being retrofitted as first platform for Conventional Prompt Strike hypersonic missiles

Weaknesses

  • - Only 3 built, extremely high per-unit cost
  • - Original AGS gun ammunition program cancelled
  • - Limited air defense capability compared to Aegis ships
  • - Peripheral VLS limits missile reload options

Arleigh Burke III

Strengths

  • + AN/SPY-6 radar offers 30x sensitivity improvement over SPY-1
  • + Integrated air and missile defense capability
  • + 96 VLS cells for Tomahawk, SM-2/3/6, ESSM, ASROC
  • + Decades of proven Aegis Combat System maturity

Weaknesses

  • - Very high unit cost approaching $2.2 billion
  • - Hull design dating to 1980s limits growth potential
  • - No integrated electric propulsion for future energy weapons
  • - Large crew requirement compared to modern designs

Verdict

The Burke III wins on capability, cost-effectiveness, and proven systems. The Zumwalt's revolutionary technology came at too high a cost for too few ships, though its role as a hypersonic missile platform gives it new relevance.

Related Articles