Skip to content
April 23:The Zeebrugge Raid108yr ago

M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams vs T-90M Proryv

Western heavyweight vs Russian modernized workhorse

General Dynamics M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams
馃嚭馃嚫

M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams

United States 路 In service 2020

The M1A2 SEPv3 is the latest upgrade of the iconic Abrams main battle tank. It features improved power generation, advanced networking, a data-link-capable ammunition data link for programmable airburst rounds, and enhanced survivability against IEDs and anti-tank missiles.

Read full article
Uralvagonzavod T-90M Proryv
馃嚪馃嚭

T-90M Proryv

Russia 路 In service 2020

The T-90M is Russia's most modern production tank, featuring a new turret with improved Relikt ERA, the Kalina fire control system, a more powerful engine, and a remotely operated machine gun. It represents the practical backbone of Russian armor forces.

The Matchup

The Abrams and T-90M represent fundamentally different tank philosophies: the American approach of a heavy, protected crew of four versus the Russian concept of a compact, lighter, autoloaded three-crew tank. How do they compare in 2025?

Performance Radar

FirepowerProtectionMobilityTechnologyVersatilityCost Efficiency
M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams
T-90M Proryv

Rating Breakdown

M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams: 92FirepowerT-90M Proryv: 85
M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams: 95ProtectionT-90M Proryv: 80
M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams: 75MobilityT-90M Proryv: 72
M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams: 88TechnologyT-90M Proryv: 70
M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams: 80VersatilityT-90M Proryv: 75
M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams: 50Cost EfficiencyT-90M Proryv: 85

Specifications

SpecificationM1A2 SEPv3 AbramsT-90M Proryv
Weight73.6 tons (66.8 tonnes)50.7 tons (46 tonnes)
Main Gun120mm M256A1 smoothbore125mm 2A46M-5 smoothbore (ATGM capable)
EngineHoneywell AGT1500 gas turbine, 1,500 hpV-92S2F diesel, 1,130 hp
Max Speed42 mph (67 km/h)37 mph (60 km/h)
Range265 mi (426 km)340 mi (550 km)
Crew43
ArmorComposite + DU mesh + ERA (classified)Composite + Relikt ERA + Shtora APS
Unit Cost$10.5M (FY2023)$4.5M (estimated)

Strengths & Weaknesses

M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams

Strengths

  • + Among the heaviest composite armor protection in service
  • + Depleted uranium mesh armor inserts for maximum protection
  • + Proven in multiple combat deployments since 1991
  • + Advanced fire control with hunter-killer capability

Weaknesses

  • - Gas turbine engine consumes enormous fuel
  • - Very heavy, limits strategic mobility and bridging
  • - High logistical footprint for sustained operations
  • - Aging hull design with limited growth margin

T-90M Proryv

Strengths

  • + Compact design with low silhouette reduces target profile
  • + Can fire ATGMs through the main gun (9M119M Refleks)
  • + Relikt ERA provides strong protection against tandem warheads
  • + Significantly cheaper than Western equivalents

Weaknesses

  • - Autoloader limits ammunition types and rate improvements
  • - Three-crew configuration means higher crew workload
  • - Carousel autoloader is vulnerable to catastrophic kill
  • - Less power-to-weight ratio than Western MBTs

Verdict

The M1A2 SEPv3 holds clear advantages in protection, fire control, and crew survivability. The T-90M counters with lower cost, smaller profile, and ATGM capability, but real-world performance in Ukraine has exposed significant vulnerabilities.

Related Articles